[Consensus document on pneumococcal vaccination in adults at risk by age and underlying clinical conditions. 2017 Update]. / Consenso sobre la vacunación anti-neumocócica en el adulto por riesgo de edad y patología de base. Actualización 2017.

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumococcal pneumonia (PP) represent an important health problem among aging adults and those with certain underlying pathologies and some diseases, especially immunosuppressed and some immunocompetent subjects, who are more susceptible to infections and present greater severity and worse evolution. Among the strategies to prevent IPD and PP, vaccination has its place, although vaccination coverage in this group is lower than desirable. Nowadays, there are 2 vaccines available for adults. Polysacharide vaccine (PPV23), used in patients aged 2 and older since decades ago, includes a greater number of serotypes (23), but it does not generate immune memory, antibody levels decrease with time, causes an immune tolerance phenomenon, and have no effect on nasopharyngeal colonization. PCV13 can be used from children 6 weeks of age to elderly and generates an immune response more powerful than PPV23 against most of the 13 serotypes included in it. In the year 2013 the 16 most directly related to groups of risk of presenting IPD publised a series of vaccine recommendations based on scientific evidence regarding anti-pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying pathologies and special conditions. A commitment was made about updating it if new scientific evidence became available. We present an exhaustive revised document focusing mainly in recommendation by age in which some more Scientific Societies have been involved.

Resumen del Consenso sobre la Vacunación Antineumocócica en el Adulto por Riesgo de Edad y Patología de Base. Actualización 2017 / No disponible

En el año 2013 algunas de las Sociedades Científicas más directamente relacionadas con los grupos de riesgo para padecer enfermedad neumocócica publicamos un documento de Consenso con una serie de recomendaciones basadas en las evidencias científicas respecto a la vacunación antineumocócica en el adulto con condiciones especiales y patología de base. Se estableció un compromiso de discusión y actualización ante la aparición de nuevas evidencias. Fruto de este trabajo de revisión, en abril de 2017 se ha publicado una actualización del anterior documento junto a 4 nuevas Sociedades Científicas donde destaca, entre otras novedades, la recomendación de vacunación por criterio de edad. Se resumen algunas de las principales novedades que presenta la actualización del documento de Consenso

In the year 2013 some of the most directly related to groups of risk of presenting IPD Scientific Societies published a series of vaccine recommendations based on scientific evidence regarding anti-pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying pathologies and special conditions. A commitment was made about updating it if new scientific evidence became available. In april 2017 an exhaustive revision over the previous document was published focusing mainly in recommendation by age. We review some of the main changes in the new Consensus document

[Consensus document on vaccination against influenza in health care workers]. / Consenso sobre la vacunación frente a la gripe en el personal sanitario.

Health care workers (HCW) are included each year among risk groups for vaccination against influenza. However, vaccination coverage among this group in our country is very low, not exceeding 25%. Convinced that one of the best tools to increase this coverage among professionals in our country are the scientific evidence, 19 scientific societies and associations professionals bringing together health professionals more directly related to influenza as an health problem, and the General Nursing Council, met to discuss and develop this consensus document in order to inform HCW about the appropriateness of their vaccination against influenza and the benefits that flow from it for themselves, for their patients and for the rest of the population. This recommendation is based on 3 pillars: argument of necessity, ethics and exemplary.

Cutaneous malignant melanoma and sun exposure in Spain.

Cutaneous malignant melanoma has an increasing importance all over the world. However very few epidemiological studies have been published from Spain, and Spanish people have not become aware of the problem. This study was designed to examine sun exposure patterns and other related items among 116 consecutive patients with melanoma and 235 controls. Each subject answered a questionnaire covering the place of residence, sun exposure details and other risk factors, and underwent a skin examination. Continuous sun exposure due to residence or occupation was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.3). People who lived in the city but spent 50% of their time in rural areas for holidays had an OR of 2.2 (95% CI = 1.3-3.8) when compared with those living in urban and rural areas. The OR for people who sunbathed more than 30 times a year was 1.8 (95% CI = 1.2-2.8), and outdoor leisure time was also associated with melanoma appearance when exposure was greater than 60 units in the last 2 years, with an OR of 3.0 (95% CI = 1.6-5.5); 1 unit is equivalent to total body sun exposure for at least 2 h. These OR estimates were adjusted for age, skin type and the number of naevi. Construction workers (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 0.5-5.6) had increased risk after adjustment for skin type, age and freckle count (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 1.8 9.9) or mole count (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.4-5.8). Working as a farmer was a protective factor after adjustment (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3-0.8). The use of sunscreens was a protective factor against melanoma (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.6-3.6 for non-users). Campaigns should focus on advising people to avoid sun exposure in sunny places and to use sunscreens every time they are exposed to the sun.